Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of risk of bias judgment for all papers and for rounds 1 and 2 separately

From: Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS—aspects of interrater agreement

All (43 papers)

Rater 2

Total

  

Low

Moderate

High

 

 Rater 1

Low

88 (34%)

39 (15%)

6 (2%)

133 (52%)

Moderate

36 (14%)

47 (18%)

4 (2%)

87 (34%)

High

6 (2%)

10 (4%)

22 (9%)

38 (15%)

 Total

130 (50%)

96 (37%)

32 (12%)

258 (100%)

Round 1 (15 papers)

 

 Rater 1

Low

32 (36%)

10 (11%)

3 (3%)

45 (50%)

Moderate

17 (19%)

18 (20%)

1 (1%)

36 (40%)

High

2 (2%)

4 (4%)

3 (3%)

9 (10%)

 Total

51 (57%)

32 (36%)

7 (8%)

90 (100%)

Round 2 (28 papers)

 Rater 1

Low

56 (33%)

29 (17%)

3 (2%)

88 (52%)

Moderate

19 (11%)

29 (17%)

3 (2%)

51 (30%)

High

4 (2%)

6 (4%)

19 (11%)

29 (17%)

 Total

79 (47%)

64 (38%)

25 (15%)

168 (100%)